PRAMOD KUMAR SON OF SHRI MAHESH CHAND, VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Rajasthan High Court reportable judgment: PRAMOD KUMAR SON OF SHRI MAHESH CHAND, VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Case: CRLMP / 4993 / 2023. Judgment dated 02 Sep 2026. The Court addressed deficiencies in scanning and uploading case records that obstructed paperless he…
Understand this judgment
AI-assisted extraction from the full official document. It is provided for faster reading, not as legal advice. Verify material propositions, eligibility and deadlines from the original source.
In 30 seconds
The Rajasthan High Court addressed deficiencies in scanning and uploading case records that obstructed paperless hearings. The Court emphasized that complete and timely digitization is essential and directed that accountability must be fixed for scanning, bookmarking, indexing, and uploading every document. Additionally, it recommended amending the Standing Order dated 02.11.2020 to cover all jurisdictions.
Issues before the Court
- Deficiencies in scanning and uploading case records obstructing paperless hearings
Court held
The Court directed that accountability must be fixed for scanning, bookmarking, indexing, and uploading every document, and that the Registrar (Judicial) place an amended Standing Order covering all jurisdictions before the Chief Justice.
Ratio / legal principle
Complete and timely digitization is essential for effective paperless justice.
Key points
- Deficiencies in scanning and uploading case records obstructed paperless hearings.
- Complete and timely digitization is essential for effective paperless justice.
- Accountability must be fixed for scanning, bookmarking, indexing, and uploading every document.
- The 02.11.2020 Standing Order, previously confined to criminal matters, required amendment to cover all jurisdictions.
- The Registrar (Judicial) was directed to place the amended Standing Order before the Chief Justice.
Why it matters
This ruling highlights administrative and technological requirements for paperless court proceedings, emphasizing institutional accountability in digitizing and managing judicial records across jurisdictions.
Topics
- Source material is a synopsis rather than the full judgment text.
- Specific details regarding parties and factual background are limited.
- The official URL is a multi-judgment listing; analysis is limited to the isolated official synopsis collected for this case.
Official court synopsis:
The Court addressed deficiencies in scanning and uploading case records that obstructed paperless hearings. HELD- Complete and timely digitization is essential for effective paperless justice; accountability must be fixed for scanning, bookmarking, indexing and uploading every document. The 02.11.2020 Standing Order, confined to criminal matters, required amendment to cover all jurisdictions. Registrar (Judicial) directed to place amended Standing Order before the Chief Justice. 3
Source: Rajasthan High Court official Recent Reportable Judgments page.
NYAYA SIGNAL structures public information for discovery. Verify critical dates, eligibility and legal propositions from the original source.
Related signals
SMT GOMA DEVI W/O SHRI MANNA LAL D/O SHRI KANA VS LAXMI NARAIN SHARMA S/O SHRI GAINDI LAL SHARMA
Rajasthan High Court reportable judgment: SMT GOMA DEVI W/O SHRI MANNA LAL D/O SHRI KANA VS LAXMI NARAIN SHARMA S/O SHR…
Advertisement for Law Researchers/Research Associates at the High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi on a Contractual Basis.
Delhi High Court official recruitment/opportunity notice: Advertisement for Law Researchers/Research Associates at the…
Circular regarding Supreme Court of India inviting applications for one (01) post of Assistant Registrar (Computer) on deputation basis.
Delhi High Court official recruitment/opportunity notice: Circular regarding Supreme Court of India inviting applicatio…