Rajasthan · Act 23 of 1961

Section 49 — Procedure where objection is taken on appeal or revision that a suit or appeal was not properly valued for jurisdictional purposes

THE RAJASTHAN COURT FEES AND SUITS VALUATION ACT, 1961

Read in your languageअपनी भाषा में पढ़ें · Official source versions

Mapped language choices keep this section. Other choices are labelled ‘Complete act’ until section mappings are verified.

Additional official language versions have not been imported for this act yet.

Only available official source versions are shown. Language labels come from source metadata or filenames.

STATUTORY TEXT
Find in this text
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 99 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Central Act 5 of 1908), an objection that by reason of the over-valuation or under valuation of a suit or appeal, a Court of first instance or lower appellate Court which had no jurisdiction with respect to the suit or appeal exercised jurisdiction with respect thereto shall not be entertained by an appellate Court, unless-

(a) the objection was taken in the Court of first instance at or before the hearing at which issues were first framed and recorded, or in the lower appellate Court in the memorandum of appeal to that Court, or

(b) the appellate Court is satisfied, for reasons to be recorded by it in writing, that the suit or appeal was over-valued or under-valued and that the over valuation or undervaluation thereof has prejudicially affected the disposal of the suit or appeal on its merits.

(2) If the objection was taken in the manner mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (1), but the appellate court is not satisfied as to both the matters mentioned in clause (b) of that subsection and has before it the materials necessary for the determination of the other grounds of appeal to itself, it shall dispose of the appeal as if there had been no defect of jurisdiction in the Court of the first instance or lower appellate court.

(3) If the objection was taken in that manner and the appellate Court is satisfied as to both those matters and has not those materials before it, it shall proceed to deal with the appeal under the rules applicable to the Court with respect to the hearing of appeal; but if it remands the suit or appeal or frames and refers issues for trial, or requires additional evidence to be taken, it shall direct its order to a Court competent to entertain the suit or appeal.

(4) The provisions of this section with respect to an appellate Court shall, so far as they can be made applicable, apply to a Court exercising revisional jurisdiction under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Central Act 5 of 1908), or other enactment for the time being in force.

आगे पढ़ें / Continue reading

Explore the next section or browse this act in the selected language.

Next · Section 50Application for probate or letters of administration →All sections / सभी धाराएँTHE RAJASTHAN COURT FEES AND SUITS VALUATION ACT, 1961 →
More sections of this actSection 1 · Short title, extent and commencementSection 2 · Application of ActSection 3 · DefinitionsSection 4 · Levy of fee in Courts and Public officesSection 5 · Fees on documents inadvertently receivedSection 6 · Multifarious suitsSection 7 · Determination of market valueSection 8 · Set off or counter claim
Source and version

India Code, Government of India. Text fetched 21 Oct 2026. Source metadata reports last modification: 2024-10-16. Check the linked official text and subsequent notifications when applying a provision.

Share this section

Section 49 — Procedure where objection is taken on appeal or revision that a suit or appeal was not properly valued for jurisdictional purposes | THE RAJASTHAN COURT FEES AND SUITS VALUATION ACT, 1961 | NYAYA SIGNAL

Share the card with this clickable reading link. पढ़ें और अगली धारा देखें।

NYAYA SIGNAL · Free access · Official source references

· Saves and reading positions stay on this device.